[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140703114918.GC21776@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:49:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....de>,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpc925_edac: Use module_platform_driver()
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:40:18PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Move edac_op_state assignment operations to probe, then convert to
> module_platform_drive() to eliminate boilerplate code, and use
> cpc925_printk instead of printk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c | 33 +++++++--------------------------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c b/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> index df6575f..8e3192a 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c
> @@ -944,6 +944,12 @@ static int cpc925_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> edac_dbg(0, "%s platform device found!\n", pdev->name);
>
> + cpc925_printk(KERN_INFO, CPC925_EDAC_REVISION "\n");
> + cpc925_printk(KERN_INFO, "\t(c) 2008 Wind River Systems, Inc\n");
This will issue multiple times on a multi-node machine with several such
bridges.
The bit converting to cpc925_printk is ok and I'll take it if you create
a patch only for it.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists