[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <53B5969A0200007800020613@mail.emea.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:44:58 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ix86: fix vDSO build
>>> On 03.07.14 at 17:34, <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:
>> Relying on static functions used just once to get inlined (and
>> subsequently have dead code paths eliminated) is wrong: Compilers are
>> free to decide whether they do this, regardless of optimization level.
>> With this not happening for vdso_addr() (observed with gcc 4.1.x), an
>> unresolved reference to align_vdso_addr() causes the build to fail.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>
> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Thanks (also for the other one).
> Any chance you could send a dump of the symbol and relocation tables
> of a .so.dbg with this problem? I'm curious why checkundef.sh never
> caught it.
vma.o is part of the kernel, not the .so.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists