[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1404404770-323-9-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 17:25:55 +0100
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, pjt@...gle.com
Subject: [RFCv2 PATCH 08/23] sched: Aggregate unweighted load contributed by task entities on parenting cfs_rq
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Energy aware scheduling relies on cpu utilization and to be able to
maintain it, we need a per run queue signal of the sum of the
unweighted, i.e. not scaled with task priority, load contribution of
runnable task entries.
The unweighted runnable load on a run queue is maintained alongside the
existing (weighted) runnable load.
This patch is the unweighted counterpart of "sched: Aggregate load
contributed by task entities on parenting cfs_rq" (commit id
2dac754e10a5).
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/debug.c | 4 ++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 1507390..b5eeae0 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1105,6 +1105,7 @@ struct sched_avg {
u64 last_runnable_update;
s64 decay_count;
unsigned long load_avg_contrib;
+ unsigned long uw_load_avg_contrib;
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 695f977..78d4151 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct task_group
P(se->avg.runnable_avg_sum);
P(se->avg.runnable_avg_period);
P(se->avg.load_avg_contrib);
+ P(se->avg.uw_load_avg_contrib);
P(se->avg.decay_count);
#endif
#undef PN
@@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "runnable_load_avg",
cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg);
+ SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "uw_runnable_load_avg",
+ cfs_rq->uw_runnable_load_avg);
SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "blocked_load_avg",
cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg);
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -635,6 +638,7 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m)
P(se.avg.runnable_avg_sum);
P(se.avg.runnable_avg_period);
P(se.avg.load_avg_contrib);
+ P(se.avg.uw_load_avg_contrib);
P(se.avg.decay_count);
#endif
P(policy);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 981406e..1ee47b3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2345,6 +2345,8 @@ static inline u64 __synchronize_entity_decay(struct sched_entity *se)
return 0;
se->avg.load_avg_contrib = decay_load(se->avg.load_avg_contrib, decays);
+ se->avg.uw_load_avg_contrib = decay_load(se->avg.uw_load_avg_contrib,
+ decays);
se->avg.decay_count = 0;
return decays;
@@ -2451,12 +2453,18 @@ static inline void __update_task_entity_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
contrib = se->avg.runnable_avg_sum * scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
contrib /= (se->avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
se->avg.load_avg_contrib = scale_load(contrib);
+
+ contrib = se->avg.runnable_avg_sum * scale_load_down(NICE_0_LOAD);
+ contrib /= (se->avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
+ se->avg.uw_load_avg_contrib = scale_load(contrib);
}
/* Compute the current contribution to load_avg by se, return any delta */
-static long __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
+static long __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(struct sched_entity *se,
+ long *uw_contrib_delta)
{
long old_contrib = se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
+ long uw_old_contrib = se->avg.uw_load_avg_contrib;
if (entity_is_task(se)) {
__update_task_entity_contrib(se);
@@ -2465,6 +2473,10 @@ static long __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(struct sched_entity *se)
__update_group_entity_contrib(se);
}
+ if (uw_contrib_delta)
+ *uw_contrib_delta = se->avg.uw_load_avg_contrib -
+ uw_old_contrib;
+
return se->avg.load_avg_contrib - old_contrib;
}
@@ -2484,7 +2496,7 @@ static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se,
int update_cfs_rq)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
- long contrib_delta;
+ long contrib_delta, uw_contrib_delta;
u64 now;
/*
@@ -2499,13 +2511,15 @@ static inline void update_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se,
if (!__update_entity_runnable_avg(now, &se->avg, se->on_rq))
return;
- contrib_delta = __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(se);
+ contrib_delta = __update_entity_load_avg_contrib(se, &uw_contrib_delta);
if (!update_cfs_rq)
return;
- if (se->on_rq)
+ if (se->on_rq) {
cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += contrib_delta;
+ cfs_rq->uw_runnable_load_avg += uw_contrib_delta;
+ }
else
subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq, -contrib_delta);
}
@@ -2582,6 +2596,8 @@ static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
}
cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
+ cfs_rq->uw_runnable_load_avg += se->avg.uw_load_avg_contrib;
+
/* we force update consideration on load-balancer moves */
update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq, !wakeup);
}
@@ -2600,6 +2616,8 @@ static inline void dequeue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(cfs_rq, !sleep);
cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg -= se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
+ cfs_rq->uw_runnable_load_avg -= se->avg.uw_load_avg_contrib;
+
if (sleep) {
cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg += se->avg.load_avg_contrib;
se->avg.decay_count = atomic64_read(&cfs_rq->decay_counter);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index c971359..46cb8bd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
* the FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case).
*/
unsigned long runnable_load_avg, blocked_load_avg;
+ unsigned long uw_runnable_load_avg;
atomic64_t decay_counter;
u64 last_decay;
atomic_long_t removed_load;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists