[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140703175412.GH17372@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:54:12 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Sneha Priya <sneha.cse@...mail.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: perf: allow tracing with kernel tracepoints
events
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:57:47PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
> When tracing with tracepoints events the IP and CPSR are set to 0,
> preventing the perf code to resolve the symbols:
>
> ./perf record -e kmem:kmalloc cal
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.007 MB perf.data (~321 samples) ]
>
> ./perf report
> Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> ........ ....... ............. ...........
> 40.78% cal [unknown] [.]00000000
> 31.6% cal [unknown] [.]00000000
>
> The examination of the gathered samples (perf report -D) shows the IP
> is set to 0 and that the samples are considered as user space samples,
> while the IP should be set from the registers and the samples should be
> considered as kernel samples.
>
> The fix is to implement perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs for ARM, which
> fills the necessary registers used for the callchain unwinding and
> to determine the user/kernel space property of the samples: ip, sp, fp
> and cpsr.
>
> Tested with perf record and tracepoints triggering (-e <tracepoint>), with
> unwinding using fp (--call-graph fp) and dwarf info (--call-graph dwarf).
>
> Reported by Sneha Priya on linaro-dev, cf.
> http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2014-May/017151.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Reported-by: Sneha Priya <sneha.cse@...mail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index 7558775..b02b5d3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,25 @@ struct pt_regs;
> extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
> extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
> #define perf_misc_flags(regs) perf_misc_flags(regs)
> +
> +/*
> + * Take a snapshot of the regs.
> + * We only need a few of the regs:
> + * - ip for PERF_SAMPLE_IP,
> + * - sp & fp for fp & dwarf based callchain unwinding,
> + * - cpsr for user_mode() tests.
> + */
> +#define perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(regs, __ip) { \
> + instruction_pointer(regs)= (__ip); \
> + __asm__ ( \
> + "str sp, %[_ARM_sp] \n\t" \
> + "str fp, %[_ARM_fp] \n\t" \
> + "mrs %[_ARM_cpsr], cpsr \n\t" \
> + : [_ARM_sp] "=m" (regs->ARM_sp), \
> + [_ARM_fp] "=m" (regs->ARM_fp), \
> + [_ARM_cpsr] "=r" (regs->ARM_cpsr) \
> + ); \
> +}
You don't appear to have addressed my comments from last time. What changed?
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists