[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B66915.4040309@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:43:01 +0800
From: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>
To: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Matthew Longnecker <MLongnecker@...dia.com>
CC: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] thermal: Add Tegra SOCTHERM thermal management driver
On 06/27/2014 04:11 PM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> This adds support for the Tegra SOCTHERM thermal sensing and management
> system found in the Tegra124 system-on-chip. This initial driver supports
> the four thermal zones with hardware-tracked trip points.
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra_soctherm.c
> +static int calculate_shared_calibration(struct tsensor_shared_calibration *r)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> + u32 shifted_cp, shifted_ft;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_TSENSOR8_CALIB, &val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + r->base_cp = val & 0x3ff;
> + r->base_ft = (val & (0x7ff << 10)) >> 10;
> +
> + err = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_SPARE_REALIGNMENT_REG_0, &val);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + /* Sign extend from 6 bits to 32 bits */
> + shifted_cp = (s32)((val & 0x1f) | ((val & 0x20) ? 0xffffffe0 : 0x0));
> + val = ((val & (0x1f << 21)) >> 21);
> + /* Sign extend from 5 bits to 32 bits */
> + shifted_ft = (s32)((val & 0xf) | ((val & 0x10) ? 0xfffffff0 : 0x0));
> +
> + r->actual_temp_cp = 2 * 25 + shifted_cp;
Do we need to define the "25" as constant, just like below line.
> + r->actual_temp_ft = 2 * NOMINAL_CALIB_FT_T124 + shifted_ft;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t soctherm_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct tegra_thermctl_zone *zone = dev_id;
> + u32 val;
> + u32 intr_mask = 0x03 << t124_thermctl_shifts[zone->sensor];
> +
> + val = readl(zone->tegra->regs + THERMCTL_INTR_STATUS);
> +
> + if ((val & intr_mask) == 0)
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + writel(val & intr_mask, zone->tegra->regs + THERMCTL_INTR_STATUS);
I think we need to disable the interrupt here, and enable it again after
updating the high/low limited values. If not, there will trigger mass of
interrupts.
> +
> +static struct platform_driver tegra_soctherm_driver = {
> + .probe = tegra_soctherm_probe,
> + .remove = tegra_soctherm_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "tegra_soctherm",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .of_match_table = tegra_soctherm_of_match,
> + },
> +};
Will you consider to add suspend/resume support?
Thanks.
Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists