[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4429781.iuSvvPCxYj@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:27:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: get rid of hardcoded assumptions about kernel stack size
On Friday 04 July 2014 11:13:31 Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> >
> > but I wonder if there is a way to avoid the extra include here, as it might also
> > cause a general slowdown because of asm/memory.h getting pulled into more .c
> > files. Would it be reasonable to hardcode PAGE_SIZE here?
> >
>
> IMO it's a bug of iop13xx platform, that it includes "higlevel" linux/reboot.h
> from a very "lowlevel" header mach/iop13xx.h. I think it should be fixed with a patch above.
> Slowing down of kernel build for a few more seconds is not good enough reason for me to
> hardcode PAGE_SIZE here.
I don't think we can pinpoint a specific header that is "wrong" here, the
fundamental problem is that our header files are a bit messy when it comes
to recursive inclusion and we'd be better off if we generally were a little
more careful about including headers from other headers.
It's also very hard to retroactively clean this up on a large scale.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists