[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140704105430.GE13434@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:54:31 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@...escale.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/fsl: Fix the device domain attach condition.
Hmm,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:27:16PM +0530, Varun Sethi wrote:
> - old_domain_info = find_domain(dev);
> + old_domain_info = dev->archdata.iommu_domain;
> if (old_domain_info && old_domain_info->domain != dma_domain) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> detach_device(dev, old_domain_info->domain);
Wouldn't this set dev->archdata.iommu_domain to NULL anyway, so that ...
> @@ -399,7 +394,7 @@ static void attach_device(struct fsl_dma_domain *dma_domain, int liodn, struct d
> * the info for the first LIODN as all
> * LIODNs share the same domain
> */
> - if (!old_domain_info)
> + if (!dev->archdata.iommu_domain)
> dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;
We already know that it _must_ be NULL here?
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
This would shrink down the patch to:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
index 93072ba..d21b554 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
@@ -399,8 +399,7 @@ static void attach_device(struct fsl_dma_domain *dma_domain, int liodn, struct d
* the info for the first LIODN as all
* LIODNs share the same domain
*/
- if (!old_domain_info)
- dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;
+ dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists