[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B68FE2.9070700@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:28:34 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
CC: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>, Hu Robert <robert.hu@...el.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix IRQs inject to L2 which belong to L1 since
race
Il 04/07/2014 13:07, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
> On 2014-07-04 12:52, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2014-07-04 11:38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 04/07/2014 11:33, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> The compiler is not aware of the fact that push/pop exists in this
>>>> function and, thus, places the vmcs parameter on the stack without
>>>> reserving the space. So the pushfq will overwrite the vmcs pointer and
>>>> let the function fail.
>>>
>>> Is that just a missing "memory" clobber? push/pop clobbers memory.
>>
>> Nope, we would needs some clobber like "stack". I wonder what is
>> required to use push in inline assembly safely?
>
> My colleague just found the answer: -mno-red-zone is required for 64-bit
> in order to play freely with the stack (or you need to stay off that
> zone, apparently some 128 bytes below the stack pointer). The kernel
> sets that switch, our unit tests do not.
Are you posting a patch? (Also, what compiler is that?)
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists