[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12714831.uRzVr7yNEz@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 22:15:54 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: S5PV210 platform clean-up
On Friday 04 July 2014 19:48:00 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This huge series is a (hopefully final) attempt to convert Samsung S5PV210
> into a DT-only and multiplatform-aware platform. It consists of several
> steps to gradually replace legacy code with one meeting current standards
> and then finally remove unused remnants.
>
> Patches 1-6 migrate the platform to fully use the Common Clock Framework
> and get rid of legacy private clock code, of which s5pv210 was the last
> user. Then patch 7 adds generic PHY driver for USB PHY on S5PV210 to allow
> USB to be supported when using DT. Further three patches (8-10) add DT
> support for mach-s5pv210 and necessary DT sources for currently supported
> boards. Patch 11 removes board files and code directly related to them,
> effectively making s5pv210 a DT-only platform. In next step, patches 12-15
> prepare remaining code for multiplatform enablement, which is finally done
> in patch 16. Patches 17-19 are a final clean-up, which remove a lot of
> unused code left after making the last S5P platform DT-only.
>
> Build tested patch by patch on following configs:
> - s3c2410_defconfig (with DT support enabled),
> - s3c6400_defconfig (with DT support enabled),
> - s5pv210_defconfig (with DT support enabled after patches adding it),
> - exynos_defconfig,
> - exynos_defconfig with S5PV210 enabled in multiplatform configuration.
>
> Boot tested on s5pv210-goni board.
>
> Note that support for smdkc110, smdkv210 and torbreck boards is provided
> by moving data from existing board files to new device tree sources. No
> testing was performed due to mentioned board not being available anymore.
> However I believe we agreed on this approach, because apparently there
> are no active users of them. See the RFC from August 2013 asking for
> removal of the whole platform [1].
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc%40vger.kernel.org/msg21882.html
>
>
Great work, everything
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
I hope we can get this into linux-next soon so we can do some more
cleanups on top.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists