| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1983136768.8892.1404508828693.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 21:20:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> To: gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Qualcomm "All Rights Reserved" in Linux staging Hi Greg, Reading this story about Qualcomm lawyers shooting DMCA takedown requests lightly against github projects: http://linux.slashdot.org/story/14/07/04/1455200/qualcomm-takes-down-100-github-repositories-with-dmca-notice http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTczNDU https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2014-07-02-Qualcomm.md It appears to me that the mere presence of those lines in Linux staging: grep -r "Qualcomm" . |grep -i "rights" ./drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.c: * CopyRight (C) 2007 Qualcomm Inc. All Rights Reserved. ./drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c:* CopyRight (C) 2007 Qualcomm Inc. All Rights Reserved. ./drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_hw.c:/* CopyRight (C) 2007 Qualcomm Inc. All Rights Reserved. might be contradicting the Dual MPL/GPL license expressed by MODULE_LICENSE() for those files. Perhaps we should ask some clarification on licensing of those files to Qualcomm ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists