lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140704063010.GY28884@atomide.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jul 2014 23:30:10 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tty: serial: Add 8250-core based omap driver

* Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> [140703 10:10]:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 06:19:47PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:52:40AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > >> > DT is supposed to contain information about the hardware, so it
> > >> > should stay the same? I think there is no non-hackish way to decide
> > >>
> > >> compatible would change, at a minimum.
> > >
> > > why? I would expect it to stay the same (and the current patch uses
> > > the same compatible strings).
> > >
> > 
> > Exactly, the new driver must support all the compatible strings
> > defined in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/omap_serial.tx
> > (which already does as you pointed out).
> > 
> > Otherwise the current drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c could never be
> > removed since that would mean breaking DT backward compatibility.
> 
> that settles it then... good. I'll start testing this next week.

Yeah full compability is the way to go here.

FYI we cannot switch over completely until runtime PM works as it
will block the deeper idle states for omaps and make it impossible
to debug PM features.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ