[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140705143603.GA3351@himangi-Dell>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 20:06:03 +0530
From: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: julia.lawall@...6.fr
Subject: [PATCH] cpupower: mperf monitor: Correct use of ! and &
In commit ae91d60ba88ef0bdb1b5e9b2363bd52fc45d2af7, a bug was fixed that
involved converting !x & y to !(x & y). The code below shows the same
pattern, and thus should perhaps be fixed in the same way.
The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
// <smpl>
@@ expression E1,E2; @@
(
!E1 & !E2
|
- !E1 & E2
+ !(E1 & E2)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>
---
This is not tested and clearly changes the semantics, so it is only
something to consider.
tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c
index 5650ab5..90a8c4f 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int init_maxfreq_mode(void)
unsigned long long hwcr;
unsigned long min;
- if (!cpupower_cpu_info.caps & CPUPOWER_CAP_INV_TSC)
+ if (!(cpupower_cpu_info.caps & CPUPOWER_CAP_INV_TSC))
goto use_sysfs;
if (cpupower_cpu_info.vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists