[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B80EFC.6020504@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 07:43:08 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>, ralf@...ux-mips.org
CC: jchandra@...adcom.com, blogic@...nwrt.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: Add #ifdef in file bridge.h
On 07/04/2014 07:50 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This patch addes a #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__ in order to check if this part
> of the file is configured to fix this #ifdef block in bridge.h for mips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/bridge.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/bridge.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/bridge.h
> index 3067f98..4f315c3 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/bridge.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/bridge.h
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
> #define BRIDGE_GIO_WEIGHT 0x2cb
> #define BRIDGE_FLASH_WEIGHT 0x2cc
>
> -/* FIXME verify */
> +#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
> #define BRIDGE_9XX_FLASH_BAR(i) (0x11 + (i))
> #define BRIDGE_9XX_FLASH_BAR_LIMIT(i) (0x15 + (i))
>
>
Hi,
Where is the corresponding #endif ?
The #endif at line 185 goes with the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ at line 176.
I think that this patch will cause a build error (or at least a warning).
Did you test it?
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists