lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 09:07:00 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] declance: Fix 64-bit compilation warnings On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 15:56 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > One question though, does either of you or anybody else know why we're > inconsistent about this 0x prefixing of virtual addresses vs physical > addresses? Specifically %p vs e.g. %pad. I think it's a mistake and I agree. I submitted a patch to remove the prefix from %pad. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/21/333 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists