lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 05 Jul 2014 11:08:59 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <>
To:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Cc:	Grant Likely <>,
	David Miller <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] declance: Fix 64-bit compilation warnings

On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 18:39 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> > >  One question though, does either of you or anybody else know why we're 
> > > inconsistent about this 0x prefixing of virtual addresses vs physical 
> > > addresses?  Specifically %p vs e.g. %pad.
> > 
> > I think it's a mistake and I agree.
> > 
> > I submitted a patch to remove the prefix from %pad.
> > 
> >
>  Great!  Your proposal looks good to me in principle, however you need to 
> factor in SPECIAL having been set by `#' somehow as `number' will respect 
> it.  I suggest using the same field width calculation that `pointer' uses 
> for `default_width' (sans the type used with `sizeof' of course, that is).

I don't think %#p is valid so it
shouldn't have been set by #.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists