[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvxP0PzuvSrPY3rUW7hdKXK2aGK1W0wn_RWubX28YFv5nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 05:44:42 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Scalability Question
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
> The most powerful super computer runs Ubuntu with over 3.2 million cores.
These kind of computers don't run a single kernel.
See grid computing.
> There fore I can state that Linux is very good at scaling as I have seem
> the other side with embedded systems.
> Cheers Nick
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Mike Galbraith
> <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 16:40 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
>>> I am curious after reading some outdated kernel papers, how scalable
>>> is the kernel of
>>> late? I am curious mostly in memory and cpu subsystems as file systems
>>> will change
>>> based on user's choice.
>>
>> You can currently configure for up to 8192 CPUs. I've not seen any
>> benchmark data whatsoever for huge boxen, have no idea where which
>> subsystem crumbles. SGI asked for the increase to 8192, so presumably
>> do manage to squeeze acceptable performance out of size XXXXL boxen.
>>
>> -Mike
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists