[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-0e59bdaea75f12a7d7c03672f4ac22c0119a1bc0@git.kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 03:45:57 -0700
From: tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
ktkhai@...allels.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
pjt@...gle.com, umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, khorenko@...allels.com,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Disable runtime_enabled on dying rq
Commit-ID: 0e59bdaea75f12a7d7c03672f4ac22c0119a1bc0
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0e59bdaea75f12a7d7c03672f4ac22c0119a1bc0
Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:19:42 +0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 11:17:42 +0200
sched/fair: Disable runtime_enabled on dying rq
We kill rq->rd on the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE stage:
cpuset_cpu_inactive -> cpuset_update_active_cpus -> partition_sched_domains ->
-> cpu_attach_domain -> rq_attach_root -> set_rq_offline
This unthrottles all throttled cfs_rqs.
But the cpu is still able to call schedule() till
take_cpu_down->__cpu_disable()
is called from stop_machine.
This case the tasks from just unthrottled cfs_rqs are pickable
in a standard scheduler way, and they are picked by dying cpu.
The cfs_rqs becomes throttled again, and migrate_tasks()
in migration_call skips their tasks (one more unthrottle
in migrate_tasks()->CPU_DYING does not happen, because rq->rd
is already NULL).
Patch sets runtime_enabled to zero. This guarantees, the runtime
is not accounted, and the cfs_rqs won't exceed given
cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1, and tasks will be pickable
in migrate_tasks(). runtime_enabled is recalculated again
when rq becomes online again.
Ben Segall also noticed, we always enable runtime in
tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(). Actually, we should do that for online
cpus only. To prevent races with unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs()
we take get_online_cpus() lock.
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
CC: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@...allels.com>
CC: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1403684382.3462.42.camel@tkhai
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +++++++-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index e50234b..2dbc63d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7817,6 +7817,11 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota)
if (period > max_cfs_quota_period)
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Prevent race between setting of cfs_rq->runtime_enabled and
+ * unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs().
+ */
+ get_online_cpus();
mutex_lock(&cfs_constraints_mutex);
ret = __cfs_schedulable(tg, period, quota);
if (ret)
@@ -7842,7 +7847,7 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota)
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&cfs_b->lock);
- for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+ for_each_online_cpu(i) {
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[i];
struct rq *rq = cfs_rq->rq;
@@ -7858,6 +7863,7 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota)
cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec();
out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&cfs_constraints_mutex);
+ put_online_cpus();
return ret;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a140c6a..923fe32 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3798,6 +3798,19 @@ static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->slack_timer);
}
+static void __maybe_unused update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+
+ for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
+ struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
+ cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF;
+ raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
+ }
+}
+
static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
@@ -3811,6 +3824,12 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
* there's some valid quota amount
*/
cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1;
+ /*
+ * Offline rq is schedulable till cpu is completely disabled
+ * in take_cpu_down(), so we prevent new cfs throttling here.
+ */
+ cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = 0;
+
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
@@ -3854,6 +3873,7 @@ static inline struct cfs_bandwidth *tg_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg)
return NULL;
}
static inline void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) {}
+static inline void update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq) {}
static inline void unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH */
@@ -7362,6 +7382,8 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
static void rq_online_fair(struct rq *rq)
{
update_sysctl();
+
+ update_runtime_enabled(rq);
}
static void rq_offline_fair(struct rq *rq)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists