lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun,  6 Jul 2014 19:42:11 +0200
From:	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To:	Michael Lentine <mlentine@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tools: perf: prefer clarity in setup_pager

“!(pager || access(…))” is indeed pretty smart way to write
“!pager && access(…) == 0” but other than being clever it gives
no advantages and merely confuses the reader who needs to wonder
what is actually going on.

As such, replace the checks with much cleaner ones.

Also, while at it, merge the lest “!pager” test with the next
test that yields true after the “!pager” if's body is executed.
---
 tools/perf/util/pager.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pager.c b/tools/perf/util/pager.c
index 31ee02d..14da1b0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pager.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pager.c
@@ -57,13 +57,11 @@ void setup_pager(void)
 	}
 	if (!pager)
 		pager = getenv("PAGER");
-	if (!(pager || access("/usr/bin/pager", X_OK)))
+	if (!pager && access("/usr/bin/pager", X_OK) == 0)
 		pager = "/usr/bin/pager";
-	if (!(pager || access("/usr/bin/less", X_OK)))
+	if (!pager && access("/usr/bin/less", X_OK) == 0)
 		pager = "/usr/bin/less";
-	if (!pager)
-		pager = "cat";
-	if (!*pager || !strcmp(pager, "cat"))
+	if (!pager || !*pager || !strcmp(pager, "cat"))
 		return;
 
 	spawned_pager = 1; /* means we are emitting to terminal */
-- 
2.0.0.526.g5318336

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ