linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/gpio/gpio-sch311x: check return value of gpiochip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53B94DC6.7070308@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 06 Jul 2014 18:53:18 +0530
From:	Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@...il.com>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Varka Bhadram <varkab@...c.in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/gpio/gpio-sch311x: check return value of gpiochip_remove()

Hi,

On Sunday 06 July 2014 02:52 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@...il.com> wrote:
>> This patch eliminates the following warning
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-sch311x.c: In function ‘sch311x_gpio_probe’:
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-sch311x.c:286:18: warning: ignoring return value of ‘gpiochip_remove’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
> gpiochip_remove() is to have its return value set to void in another
> patch, so I'm not sure we need this one in the meantime?

I also saw that patch from abdoulaye berthe<berthe.ab@...il.com>  .

If that is accepted its good. If not this may require.

-- 
Regards,
Varka Bhadram

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/