[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140706151242.GN18167@minantech.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 18:12:42 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Make x2APIC support depend on interrupt remapping
or guest support
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:47:54AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>
> We are able to use x2APIC mode in the absence of interrupt remapping on
> certain hypervisors. So it if fine to disable IRQ_REMAP without having
> to give up x2APIC support.
FWIW I did similar thing back when I added x2apic to KVM:
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2009-06/msg14579.html
But was advised against it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index a8f749e..30a9987 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ config SMP
>
> config X86_X2APIC
> bool "Support x2apic"
> - depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_64 && IRQ_REMAP
> + depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC && X86_64 && (IRQ_REMAP || HYPERVISOR_GUEST)
> ---help---
> This enables x2apic support on CPUs that have this feature.
>
>
>
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists