[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:43:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf: Prevent race in PERF_SAMPLE_READ group format
sample output
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:20:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:04:28AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:44:35PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > >
> > > While iterating siblings in perf_output_read_group we could
> > > race with addition and removal of sibling in perf_group_attach
> > > and perf_group_detach respective.
> >
> > So why would anybody do this?
>
> the test program from 0/1 email hangs up my server
> but no standard reason AFAICS
>
> I've got soft lockup, sometimes ended up with unkillable perf process
> also few total server hangs
OK, so that's useful information to have in a Changelog ;-)
Not immediately obvious how that can happen though. I can see the output
getting scrambled.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists