lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:02:18 +0200
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@...gle.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	rjw@...ysocki.net, ghackmann@...gle.com, toddpoynor@...gle.com,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] power: add an API to log wakeup reasons

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@...gle.com> wrote:
> For power management diagnostic purposes, it is often useful to know
> what interrupts are frequently waking the system from low power
> suspend mode, especially on battery-powered consumer electronics
> devices that are expected to spend much of their time in low-power
> suspend while not in active use.  For example, reduced battery life on
> a mobile phone may be caused in part by frequent wakeups by broadcast
> traffic on a busy wireless LAN even while the screen is off and the
> phone not in active use.
>
> Add API log_wakeup_reason() exposes it to userspace via the sysfs path
> /sys/kernel/wakeup_reasons/last_resume_reason. This API would be called
> from the paltform specific, or from the driver for the interrupt controller,
> when the system resumes because of an IRQ. It logs the reasons which caused
> the system to wakeup from the low-power mode.
>
> This information can be collected by userspace as part of the accounting
> kept on power consumption.

Rafael,
   I realize its been awhile here, but seeing as discussion on this
petered out somewhat ambiguously, I was curious if your thoughts on
using wakeup_sources for this was considered a prereq for further
discussion or if it was a softer thought experiment?

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ