[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1407071520370.1655@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:22:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] ftrace: Add dynamically allocated trampolines
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Well, I guess the answer to that is what do you consider the trampoline?
> I'm currently considering it to be the assembly code that the
> mcount/fentry call jumps to. We only have two trampolines (three if you
> count the function graph code that will be called directly come 3.17).
> Those two are the normal ftrace_caller and the ftrace_regs_caller.
BTW, on those archs that support regs saving already, is there really a
reson not to kill ftrace_caller and keep just ftrace_regs_caller?
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists