linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:54:23 +0200
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:01:36AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 02:43:02 PM Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > On 06/18/14 23:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >> 
> > >> The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual.
> > >> 
> > >> Changes since 20140618:
> > >> 
> > >
> > > on i386:
> > >
> > > CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled.
> > >
> > >   CC      drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o
> > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c: In function 'i915_drm_freeze':
> > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_target_system_state' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: error: 'ACPI_STATE_S3' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > >   CC      net/dccp/qpolicy.o
> > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > > make[5]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o] Error 1
> > 
> > Thanks for the report, we'll fix it.
> > 
> > Can anyone explain why include/linux/acpi_bus.h has #ifdef
> > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP and conditional build for a dummy inline version of
> > acpi_target_system_state(), *but* that does not get included or used if
> > CONFIG_ACPI=n? Additionally, the combination of CONFIG_ACPI=y and
> > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n does not seem to work at all.
> 
> These two things look like bugs to me.  Most likely not tested thoruoughly
> enough.
> 
> > So we'll really have to sprinkle #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI all over, instead of
> > neatly using the dummy versions that someone has gone through the
> > trouble of adding?
> 
> No, we don't have to.

Back from my vacation and I didn't see a conclusion to this issue here.
Rafael, have you fixed this in your acpi tree or do I need to do something
in drm-intel?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/