linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] phy: core: the node pointer of PHY need not be the same as that of PHY provider

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:59:10 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
	antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
	maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] phy: core: the node pointer of PHY need not be
 the same as that of PHY provider

On Mon, 07 Jul 2014, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Monday 07 July 2014 06:42 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 04 Jul 2014, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > 
> >> In case of multi-phy PHY providers, each PHY should be modeled as a sub
> >> node of the PHY provider. Then each PHY will have a different node pointer
> >> (node pointer of sub node) than that of PHY provider. Added this provision
> >> in the PHY core.
> >> Also fixed all drivers to use the updated API.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/phy.txt               |   10 ++++++----
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-bcm-kona-usb2.c     |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-core.c              |   25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-exynos-dp-video.c   |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-exynos-mipi-video.c |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c    |    3 ++-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-exynos5250-sata.c   |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-mvebu-sata.c        |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-omap-usb2.c         |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c      |    3 ++-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-sun4i-usb.c         |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-ti-pipe3.c          |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-twl4030-usb.c       |    2 +-
> >>  drivers/phy/phy-xgene.c             |    2 +-
> >>  include/linux/phy/phy.h             |   15 ++++++++++-----
> >>  15 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > 
> > I wrote a very similar patch already.  I knew I should have sent it on
> > Friday. :(
> 
> No problem! you can send your patch along with the MiPHY series.

That's okay.  It's silly for us both to submit the same patch and
yours hit the MLs first & looks good so, the honour is yours.

> > Patch looks good, just a real minor point.
> > 
> >>  	phy->dev.class = phy_class;
> >>  	phy->dev.parent = dev;
> >> -	phy->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> >> +	phy->dev.of_node = node?node:dev->of_node;
> > 
> > There should be spaces either side of the '?' and ':', or you can do
> > this more succinctly by:
> > 
> > phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;
> > 
> > Once fixed, feel free to add my:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/