[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140708204017.GG17860@moon.sw.swsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 00:40:17 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Don't forget to set softdirty on file mapped fault
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:19:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 23:21:51 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Otherwise we may not notice that pte was softdirty because pte_mksoft_dirty
> > helper _returns_ new pte but not modifies argument.
>
> When fixing a bug, please describe the end-user visible effects of that
> bug.
>
> [for the 12,000th time :(]
"we may not notice that pte was softdirty" I thought it's enough, because
that's the effect user sees -- pte is not dirtified where it should.
Really sorry Andrew if I were not clear enough. What about: In case if page
fault happend on dirty filemapping the newly created pte may not
notice if old one were already softdirtified because pte_mksoft_dirty
doesn't modify its argument but rather returns new pte value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists