[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140708205448.GH17860@moon.sw.swsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 00:54:48 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Don't forget to set softdirty on file mapped fault
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:45:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> The user doesn't know or care about pte bits.
>
> What actually *happens*? Does criu migration hang? Does it lose data?
> Does it take longer?
Ah, I see. Yes, the softdirty bit might be lost that usespace program
won't see that a page was modified. So data lose is possible.
> IOW, what would an end-user's bug report look like?
>
> It's important to think this way because a year from now some person
> we've never heard of may be looking at a user's bug report and
> wondering whether backporting this patch will fix it. Amongst other
> reasons.
Here is updated changelog, sounds better?
---
In case if page fault happend on dirty filemapping the newly created pte
may loose softdirty bit thus if a userspace program is tracking memory
changes with help of a memory tracker (CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) it might
miss modification of a memory page (which in worts case may lead to
data inconsistency).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists