[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140708.141708.2064358397103630362.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 14:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: decot@...glers.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, edumazet@...gle.com, amwang@...hat.com,
antonio@...hcoding.com, jpirko@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] netpoll: avoid reference leaks
From: David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:35:14 -0700
> Thanks for the feedback. This patch results from manual inspection of
> the code. I agree my commit description is abusive: in the case of
> bonding, I think everything is fine, there should be no ref leak,
> cleanup paths seem clean.
>
> My point was to make things more predictable: ndo_netpoll_cleanup
> called anyways to acknowledge actual loss of a ref to npinfo,
> irrespective of whether it's the last ref or not. Without this patch,
> calling ndo_netpoll_cleanup would depend on some timing behavior, hard
> to predict, and users of the API have better be careful to reclaim the
> refs manually anyways: as a consequence, not sure this callback is
> actually required in its current inception.
You've increased my confusion rather than decreased it.
You fail to address the core issue in my feedback:
Whoever drops the refcount to zero must be the one to invoke
the cleanup function.
Please address this concisely, and directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists