linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.15 117/122] netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcnt leak in dying/unconfirmed list dumper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140707235737.744740701@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon,  7 Jul 2014 16:57:59 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.15 117/122] netfilter: ctnetlink: fix refcnt leak in dying/unconfirmed list dumper

3.15-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

commit cd5f336f1780cb20e83146cde64d3d5779e175e6 upstream.

'last' keeps track of the ct that had its refcnt bumped during previous
dump cycle.  Thus it must not be overwritten until end-of-function.

Another (unrelated, theoretical) issue: Don't attempt to bump refcnt of a conntrack
whose reference count is already 0.  Such conntrack is being destroyed
right now, its memory is freed once we release the percpu dying spinlock.

Fixes: b7779d06 ('netfilter: conntrack: spinlock per cpu to protect special lists.')
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c |    8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@ static int ctnetlink_done_list(struct ne
 static int
 ctnetlink_dump_list(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb, bool dying)
 {
-	struct nf_conn *ct, *last = NULL;
+	struct nf_conn *ct, *last;
 	struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *h;
 	struct hlist_nulls_node *n;
 	struct nfgenmsg *nfmsg = nlmsg_data(cb->nlh);
@@ -1163,6 +1163,8 @@ ctnetlink_dump_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (cb->args[2])
 		return 0;
 
+	last = (struct nf_conn *)cb->args[1];
+
 	for (cpu = cb->args[0]; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
 		struct ct_pcpu *pcpu;
 
@@ -1171,7 +1173,6 @@ ctnetlink_dump_list(struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 		pcpu = per_cpu_ptr(net->ct.pcpu_lists, cpu);
 		spin_lock_bh(&pcpu->lock);
-		last = (struct nf_conn *)cb->args[1];
 		list = dying ? &pcpu->dying : &pcpu->unconfirmed;
 restart:
 		hlist_nulls_for_each_entry(h, n, list, hnnode) {
@@ -1190,7 +1191,8 @@ restart:
 						  ct);
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 			if (res < 0) {
-				nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general);
+				if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use))
+					continue;
 				cb->args[0] = cpu;
 				cb->args[1] = (unsigned long)ct;
 				spin_unlock_bh(&pcpu->lock);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/