[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140707.193505.345276817146527821.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: decot@...glers.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, edumazet@...gle.com, amwang@...hat.com,
antonio@...hcoding.com, jpirko@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] netpoll: avoid reference leaks
From: David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:50:10 -0700
> This ensures that the ndo_netpoll_cleanup callback is called for every
> device that provides one. Otherwise there is a risk of reference leak
> with bonding for example, which depends on this callback to cleanup
> the slaves' references to netpoll info.
>
> Tested:
> see patch "netpoll: fix use after free"
>
> Signed-off-by: David Decotigny <decot@...glers.com>
I definitely don't understand this.
Why would we call the cleanup function of an object before it's
reference count hits zero? It is exactly the act of reaching a
zero refcount which should trigger invoking the cleanup callback.
If a refcount is being released in another location without checking
if it hits zero and invoking the cleanup if so, _THAT_ is the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists