linux-kernel - [PATCH] KVM: x86: Check for nested events if there is an injectable interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:30:23 -0400
From:	Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
To:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Check for nested events if there is an injectable interrupt


With commit b6b8a1451fc40412c57d1 that introduced
vmx_check_nested_events, checks for injectable interrupts happen
at different points in time for L1 and L2 that could potentially
cause a race. The regression occurs because KVM_REQ_EVENT is always
set when nested_run_pending is set even if there's no pending interrupt.
Consequently, there could be a small window when check_nested_events
returns without exiting to L1, but an interrupt comes through soon
after and it incorrectly, gets injected to L2 by inject_pending_event
Fix this by adding a call to check for nested events too when a check
for injectable interrupt returns true

Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 73537ec..56327a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5907,6 +5907,19 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool req_int_win)
 			kvm_x86_ops->set_nmi(vcpu);
 		}
 	} else if (kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(vcpu)) {
+		/*
+		 * TODO/FIXME: We are calling check_nested_events again
+		 * here to avoid a race condition. We should really be
+		 * setting KVM_REQ_EVENT only on certain events
+		 * and not unconditionally.
+		 * See https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/2/60 for discussion
+		 * about this proposal and current concerns
+		 */
+		if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && kvm_x86_ops->check_nested_events) {
+			r = kvm_x86_ops->check_nested_events(vcpu, req_int_win);
+			if (r != 0)
+				return r;
+		}
 		if (kvm_x86_ops->interrupt_allowed(vcpu)) {
 			kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu),
 					    false);
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/