lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:48:47 +0400
From:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86@...nel.org,
	UML devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkstack: use $UTS_MACHINE as target architecture

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:22:38 +0400 Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> This fixes command # make checkstack for i386/x86_64.
>> Looks like $UTS_MACHINE is exactly what scripts/checkstack.pl needs.
>>
>> By default $UTS_MACHINE is equal to $ARCH, but some arch/${ARCH}/Makefile
>> overrides it. This patch updates it also in arch/x86/Makefile.um
>>
>> broken in ffee0de ("x86: Default to ARCH=x86 to avoid overriding CONFIG_64BIT")
>
> The changelog doesn't describe the bug which is being fixed.  It should
> do so please.  If there are any compiler/make error messages then those
> should be included.
>

Oh, ok. checkstalk.pl needs either i386 or x86_64, x86 isn't enough.

$ make checkstack
objdump -d vmlinux $(find . -name '*.ko') | \
perl /home/blind/src/linux-stable/scripts/checkstack.pl x86
wrong or unknown architecture "x86"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ