[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140708075843.GA59558@jmac>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 00:58:43 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Changman Lee <cm224.lee@...sung.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: f2fs: Add f2fs_balance_fs for direct IO
Hi Huang,
It occurs a merge conflict.
Please check the patch.
Anyway, IMO, it needs to place f2fs_balance_fs somewhere in get_data_block.
Thanks,
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:46:28PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Otherwise, if a large amount of direct IO writes were done, the
> segment allocation may be failed because no enough segments are gced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1038,6 +1038,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_direct_IO(int rw, st
> {
> struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(inode->i_sb);
>
> /* Let buffer I/O handle the inline data case. */
> if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode))
> @@ -1046,8 +1047,11 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_direct_IO(int rw, st
> if (check_direct_IO(inode, rw, iter, offset))
> return 0;
>
> + if (rw == WRITE)
> + f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
> +
> /* clear fsync mark to recover these blocks */
> - fsync_mark_clear(F2FS_SB(inode->i_sb), inode->i_ino);
> + fsync_mark_clear(sbi, inode->i_ino);
>
> return blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode, iter, offset,
> get_data_block);
--
Jaegeuk Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists