linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Add designated reviewers for RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140708080908.GN19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:09:08 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	sbw@....edu, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Add designated reviewers for RCU

On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:03PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>  MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1814075c0e74..92f2bf91eec1 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -7405,6 +7405,9 @@ F:	kernel/rcu/torture.c
>  
>  RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK
>  M:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> +R:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> +R:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> +R:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>  L:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>  S:	Supported
>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git

OK,.. so if we're going to do this can we talk about the syntax here.

I would like to also use this for SCHED and PERF, but since both are
rather big I would like to be able to subdivide things. Now I could of
course go create many MAINTAINER sections, but that feels artificial.

So I would like to be able to write:

SCHEDULER:
...
R:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> (kernel/sched/rt.c)
R:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>    (kernel/sched/deadline.c)

or something like that. And here I've already done concessions in that
the above is machine readable. Ideally I'd be able to say things like:
'for sched and numa related things' add 'rik and mel'.

Hmm, maybe we can look at the patch subject tag like: sched/numa or
sched/rt or sched/deadline etc.. instead of the files touched.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped