[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1404807961-30530-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 17:25:55 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <dev@...xeye.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
CC: <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<gnurou@...il.com>, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/6] drm: nouveau: memory coherency on ARM
Another revision of this patchset critical for GK20A to operate.
Previous attempts were exclusively using either TTM's regular page allocator or
the DMA API one. Both have their advantages and drawbacks: the page allocator is
fast but requires explicit synchronization on non-coherent architectures,
whereas the DMA allocator always returns coherent memory, but is also slower,
creates a permanent kernel mapping, and is more constrained as to which memory
it can use.
This version attempts to use the most-fit allocator according to the buffer
use-case:
- buffers that are passed to user-space can explicitly be synced during their
validation and preparation for CPU access, as previously shown by Lucas
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2013-August/014029.html ). For
these, we don't mind if the memory is not coherent and prefer to use the page
allocator.
- buffers that are used by the kernel, typically fences and GPFIFO buffers, are
accessed rarely and thus should not trigger a costly flush or cache
invalidation. For these, we want to guarantee coherent access and use the DMA
API if necessary.
This series attempts to implement this behavior by allowing the
TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED flag to be passed to nouveau_bo_new(). On coherent
architectures this flag is a no-op ; on non-coherent architectures, it will
force the creation of a coherent buffer using the DMA-API.
Several fixes and changes were necessary to enable this behavior:
- CPU addresses of DMA-allocated BOs must be made visible (patch 1) so the
coherent mapping can be used by drivers
- The DMA-sync functions are required for BOs populated using the page allocator
(patch 4). Pages need to be mapped to the device using the correct API if we
are to call the sync functions (patch 2). Additionally, we need to understand
whether we are on a CPU-coherent architecture (patch 3).
- Coherent BOs need to be detected by Nouveau so their coherent kernel mapping
can be used instead of creating a new one (patch 5).
- Finally, buffers that are used by the kernel should be requested to be
coherent (page 6).
Changes since v3:
- Only use the DMA allocator for BOs that strictly require to be coherent
- Fixed the way pages are mapped to the GPU on platform devices
- Thoroughly checked with CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG that there were no API violations
Alexandre Courbot (6):
drm/ttm: expose CPU address of DMA-allocated pages
drm/nouveau: map pages using DMA API on platform devices
drm/nouveau: introduce nv_device_is_cpu_coherent()
drm/nouveau: synchronize BOs when required
drm/nouveau: implement explicitly coherent BOs
drm/nouveau: allocate GPFIFOs and fences coherently
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/device/base.c | 14 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/core/device.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 12 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv84_fence.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc_dma.c | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c | 6 +-
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 2 +
10 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.0.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists