[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53BBB677.2010401@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 11:14:31 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
UML devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] checkstack: use $UTS_MACHINE as target architecture
Am 08.07.2014 11:09, schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>> Am 08.07.2014 11:03, schrieb Konstantin Khlebnikov:
>>> I know. But debugging/profiling of kernel code is much easier when it
>>> runs in userspace.
>>> I think this is the last use case where uml might beat normal hardware
>>> accelerated qemu/kvm.
>>> But without SMP and with that high overhead on each syscall and
>>> context/mm switch it's mostly useless.
>>
>> The major use case of UML is that you can run it on hardware without
>> KVM support.
>> Everyone else is using KVM.
>
> And that you don't need root permissions to run it.
> Which is why I'm still interested in an ARM port.
> Need... More... Spare... Time...
You can use KVM also without being root.
It depends on the rights of /dev/kvm.
But yes, an ARM ports would be nice to have. :)
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists