[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140708092628.GA19860@kernel>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 17:26:28 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Check for nested events if there is an
injectable interrupt
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:00:35AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>Il 08/07/2014 08:56, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>>I don't think arch.nmi_pending can flip asynchronously, only in the
>>context of the VCPU thread - in contrast to pending IRQ states.
>
>Right, only nmi_queued is changed from other threads. /me should
>really look at the code instead of going from memory.
>
>>>Jan, what do you think? Can you run Jailhouse through this patch?
>>
>>Jailhouse seems fine with it, and it resolves the lockup of nested KVM
>>here as well.
>
>Thinking more about it, I think this is the right fix. Not setting
>KVM_REQ_EVENT in some cases can be an optimization, but it's not
>necessary. Definitely there are other cases in which KVM_REQ_EVENT
>is set even though no event is pending---most notably during
>emulation of invalid guest state.
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
>
>Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists