linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53BBC2F9.4070808@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:07:53 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Don't use acpi_lapic in ACPI core code

On 2014年07月08日 05:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:24 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
>>
>> Now ARM64 support is being added to ACPI so architecture specific
>> values can not be used in core ACPI code.
>>
>> Following on the patch "ACPI / processor: Check if LAPIC is present
>> during initialization" which uses acpi_lapic in acpi_processor.c,
>> on ARM64 platform, GIC is used instead of local APIC, so acpi_lapic
>> is not a suitable value for ARM64.
>>
>> What is actually important at this point is the SMPness of the system,
>> so introduce acpi_arch_is_smp() to be arch specific and generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h  |    5 +++++
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h   |    5 +++++
>>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> index 75dc59a..2fc0757 100644
>> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ extern int acpi_lapic;
>>  #define acpi_noirq 0	/* ACPI always enabled on IA64 */
>>  #define acpi_pci_disabled 0 /* ACPI PCI always enabled on IA64 */
>>  #define acpi_strict 1	/* no ACPI spec workarounds on IA64 */
>> +
>> +static inline bool acpi_arch_is_smp(void)
> Why this name?  In particular, local APIC being present doesn't imply SMP.

Hmm, agreed. How about acpi_has_cpu_in_madt()? As we know,
Local APIC/SAPIC in MADT stands for CPU in the system, how about
the function name above?

>
>> +{
>> +	return acpi_lapic;
> Also
>
> 	return !!acpi_lapic;
>
> would be cleaner IMO.
>

I will update it as you suggested.

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/