| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140708104655.GC6501@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 11:46:56 +0100
From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Device Tree ML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] pci: Introduce a domain number for
pci_host_bridge.
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:43:31PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Make it easier to discover the domain number of a bus by storing
> > the number in pci_host_bridge for the root bus. Several architectures
> > have their own way of storing this information, so it makes sense
> > to try to unify the code. While at this, add a new function that
> > creates a root bus in a given domain and make pci_create_root_bus()
> > a wrapper around this function.
>
> "While at this" is always a good clue that maybe something should be
> split into a separate patch :) This is a very good example, since it
> adds a new interface that deserves its own changelog.
Yes, I'm coming to the same conclusion. :)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
> > Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/probe.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > include/linux/pci.h | 4 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index 2c92662..abf5e82 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -1748,8 +1748,9 @@ void __weak pcibios_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > -struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > - struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
> > +struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus_in_domain(struct device *parent,
> > + int domain, int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
> > + struct list_head *resources)
>
> I don't think we should do it this way; this makes it possible to have a
> host bridge where "bridge->domain_nr != pci_domain_nr(bridge->bus)".
>
> I wonder if it would help to make a weak pci_domain_nr() function that
> returns "bridge->domain_nr". Then each arch could individually drop its
> pci_domain_nr() definition as it was converted, e.g., something like this:
>
> - Convert every arch pci_domain_nr() from a #define to a non-inline
> function
> - Add bridge.domain_nr, initialized from pci_domain_nr()
> - Add a weak generic pci_domain_nr() that returns bridge.domain_nr
> - Add a way to create a host bridge in a specified domain, so we can
> initialize bridge.domain_nr without using pci_domain_nr()
> - Convert each arch to use the new creation mechanism and drop its
> pci_domain_nr() implementation
I will try to propose a patch implementing this.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> > {
> > int error;
> > struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> > @@ -1762,27 +1763,31 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> >
> > bridge = pci_alloc_host_bridge();
> > if (!bridge)
> > - return NULL;
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > bridge->dev.parent = parent;
> > bridge->dev.release = pci_release_host_bridge_dev;
> > + bridge->domain_nr = domain;
> >
> > b = pci_alloc_bus();
> > - if (!b)
> > + if (!b) {
> > + error = -ENOMEM;
> > goto err_out;
> > + }
> >
> > b->sysdata = sysdata;
> > b->ops = ops;
> > b->number = b->busn_res.start = bus;
> > - b2 = pci_find_bus(pci_domain_nr(b), bus);
> > + b2 = pci_find_bus(bridge->domain_nr, bus);
> > if (b2) {
> > /* If we already got to this bus through a different bridge, ignore it */
> > dev_dbg(&b2->dev, "bus already known\n");
> > + error = -EEXIST;
> > goto err_bus_out;
> > }
> >
> > bridge->bus = b;
> > - dev_set_name(&bridge->dev, "pci%04x:%02x", pci_domain_nr(b), bus);
> > + dev_set_name(&bridge->dev, "pci%04x:%02x", bridge->domain_nr, bus);
> > error = pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(bridge);
> > if (error)
> > goto err_out;
> > @@ -1801,7 +1806,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> >
> > b->dev.class = &pcibus_class;
> > b->dev.parent = b->bridge;
> > - dev_set_name(&b->dev, "%04x:%02x", pci_domain_nr(b), bus);
> > + dev_set_name(&b->dev, "%04x:%02x", bridge->domain_nr, bus);
> > error = device_register(&b->dev);
> > if (error)
> > goto class_dev_reg_err;
> > @@ -1851,7 +1856,27 @@ err_bus_out:
> > kfree(b);
> > err_out:
> > kfree(bridge);
> > - return NULL;
> > + return ERR_PTR(error);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > + struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
> > +{
> > + int domain_nr;
> > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_alloc_bus();
> > + if (!b)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + b->sysdata = sysdata;
> > + domain_nr = pci_domain_nr(b);
> > + kfree(b);
> > +
> > + b = pci_create_root_bus_in_domain(parent, domain_nr, bus,
> > + ops, sysdata, resources);
> > + if (IS_ERR(b))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + return b;
> > }
> >
> > int pci_bus_insert_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b, int bus, int bus_max)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index 466bcd1..7e7b939 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge_window {
> > struct pci_host_bridge {
> > struct device dev;
> > struct pci_bus *bus; /* root bus */
> > + int domain_nr;
> > struct list_head windows; /* pci_host_bridge_windows */
> > void (*release_fn)(struct pci_host_bridge *);
> > void *release_data;
> > @@ -769,6 +770,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
> > struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
> > struct list_head *resources);
> > +struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus_in_domain(struct device *parent,
> > + int domain, int bus, struct pci_ops *ops,
> > + void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources);
> > int pci_bus_insert_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b, int bus, int busmax);
> > int pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(struct pci_bus *b, int busmax);
> > void pci_bus_release_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b);
> > --
> > 2.0.0
> >
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists