[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53BBD8BC.7040602@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 13:40:44 +0200
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
To: Masaru Nomura <massa.nomura@...il.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: Remove unnecessary parameter from drm_ht_remove_item()
On 07/08/2014 01:24 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:52:13PM +0100, Masaru Nomura wrote:
>> removed drm_open_hash from drm_ht_remove_item() as the parameter is
>> not used within the function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masaru Nomura <massa.nomura@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Please review this patch carefully. The reason the parameter is passed
>> might be some historical one or clarity of which drm_open_hash
>> we remove an item from.
> Reasons for this are probably lost. On the patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Acked-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
>
> Aside: Imo we could/should just move all the users to directly employ the
> linux hashtab instead of partially reinventing the wheel here in drm.
> -Daniel
>
Actually, in this case, the wheel was invented in drm before it was made
generic :).
It's possible to utilize part of "hashtable.h" but I don't think the
code size gain
will be major...
/Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists