[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1404828246.1967.8.camel@jarvis.lan>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 07:04:06 -0700
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] blk-lib: fix error reporting
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 09:05 -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > > + if (unlikely(err))
> > > + ACCESS_ONCE(bb->error) = err;
> >
> > I can't see a reason for the ACCESS_ONCE here.
>
> Multiple bios can be completed concurrently, so they write bb->error at
> the same time. The compiler may do store tearing (see "store tearing" in
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt) - it may split one 4-byte write into
> several smaller writes - and it could result in setting bb->error to
> invalid value. We need ACCESS_ONCE to make sure that store tearing doesn't
> happen.
That's not correct, because it's not applicable in this case. Tearing
may occur on misalignment (which ACCESS_ONCE() cannot rectify because
it's architectural), short constant loads (again, usually architectural)
and structure copies, none of which applies here.
We can rely on a properly aligned 32 bit write being atomic.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists