| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:47:23 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, oleg@...hat.com,
sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/17] rcu: Bind grace-period kthreads to
non-NO_HZ_FULL CPUs
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:24:00PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:38:15PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Binding the grace-period kthreads to the timekeeping CPU resulted in
> > significant performance decreases for some workloads. For more detail,
> > see:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/3/395 for benchmark numbers
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/4/218 for CPU statistics
> >
> > It turns out that it is necessary to bind the grace-period kthreads
> > to the timekeeping CPU only when all but CPU 0 is a nohz_full CPU
> > on the one hand or if CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=y on the other.
> > In other cases, it suffices to bind the grace-period kthreads to the
> > set of non-nohz_full CPUs.
> >
> > This commit therefore creates a tick_nohz_not_full_mask that is the
> > complement of tick_nohz_full_mask, and then binds the grace-period
> > kthread to the set of CPUs indicated by this new mask, which covers
> > the CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=n case. The CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=y
> > case still binds the grace-period kthreads to the timekeeping CPU.
> > This commit also includes the tick_nohz_full_enabled() check suggested
> > by Frederic Weisbecker.
> >
> > Reported-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > [ paulmck: Created housekeeping_affine() per fweisbec feedback. ]
> > ---
> > include/linux/tick.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 14 +++++++++-----
> > kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> > index b84773cb9f4c..c39af3261351 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
> > #include <linux/context_tracking_state.h>
> > #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > +#include <linux/sched.h>
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> >
> > @@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ static inline u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64 *unused) { return -1; }
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > extern bool tick_nohz_full_running;
> > extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
> > +extern cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_not_full_mask;
>
> So I'm still puzzled by this mask.
>
> How about creating a temporary cpumask on top of tick_nohz_full_mask
> from housekeeping_affine().
>
> If you wonder about performance, this can be called once for good from
> rcu_spawn_gp_kthread() (that would be much better than checking that all
> the time from the kthread itself anyway).
I was figuring that a fair number of the kthreads might eventually
be using this, not just for the grace-period kthreads. In addition,
my concern about once-for-good affinity is for the NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=y
case, where moving the grace-period kthreads prevents ever entering
full-system idle state.
Or am I missing some use case?
Thanx, Paul
> In case you're out of time, I can handle that. Just checking your opinion.
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void)
> > {
> > @@ -194,6 +196,23 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick_all(void) { }
> > static inline void __tick_nohz_task_switch(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
> > #endif
> >
> > +static inline bool is_housekeeping_cpu(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > + if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> > + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_not_full_mask);
> > +#endif
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > + if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> > + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, tick_nohz_not_full_mask);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline void tick_nohz_full_check(void)
> > {
> > if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > index 719587af7b10..b39ba7239bd6 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > @@ -2846,12 +2846,16 @@ static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > */
> > static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
> > {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > - int cpu = tick_do_timer_cpu;
> > + int __maybe_unused cpu;
> >
> > - if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> > + if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> > return;
> > - if (raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> > + cpu = tick_do_timer_cpu;
> > + if (cpu >= 0 && cpu < nr_cpu_ids && raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)
> > set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
> > -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> > +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */
> > + if (!is_housekeeping_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id()))
> > + housekeeping_affine(current);
> > +#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */
> > }
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > index 6558b7ac112d..e023134d63a1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static void tick_sched_handle(struct tick_sched *ts, struct pt_regs *regs)
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_full_mask;
> > +cpumask_var_t tick_nohz_not_full_mask;
> > bool tick_nohz_full_running;
> >
> > static bool can_stop_full_tick(void)
> > @@ -281,6 +282,7 @@ static int __init tick_nohz_full_setup(char *str)
> > int cpu;
> >
> > alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&tick_nohz_full_mask);
> > + alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&tick_nohz_not_full_mask);
> > if (cpulist_parse(str, tick_nohz_full_mask) < 0) {
> > pr_warning("NOHZ: Incorrect nohz_full cpumask\n");
> > return 1;
> > @@ -291,6 +293,8 @@ static int __init tick_nohz_full_setup(char *str)
> > pr_warning("NO_HZ: Clearing %d from nohz_full range for timekeeping\n", cpu);
> > cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> > }
> > + cpumask_andnot(tick_nohz_not_full_mask,
> > + cpu_possible_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> > tick_nohz_full_running = true;
> >
> > return 1;
> > @@ -332,9 +336,15 @@ static int tick_nohz_init_all(void)
> > pr_err("NO_HZ: Can't allocate full dynticks cpumask\n");
> > return err;
> > }
> > + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&tick_nohz_not_full_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> > + pr_err("NO_HZ: Can't allocate not-full dynticks cpumask\n");
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > err = 0;
> > cpumask_setall(tick_nohz_full_mask);
> > cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_nohz_full_mask);
> > + cpumask_clear(tick_nohz_not_full_mask);
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_nohz_not_full_mask);
> > tick_nohz_full_running = true;
> > #endif
> > return err;
> > --
> > 1.8.1.5
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists