[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140708160720.GA13135@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 12:07:20 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com,
mjg59@...f.ucam.org, greg@...ah.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
chaowang@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, pjones@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] kexec: Verify signature of PE signed bzImage
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:54:14PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:01:34PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Given that this time we have a new use case, I am hoping that idea of
> > parsing PE and verifying signature is more acceptable.
>
> Maybe.
>
> In any case, I still think that you should post the full patch set and
> not refer to some repo so that people can take a look at the whole
> thing.
>
Is referring to other posting is fine?
David Howells just posted PKCS7 patches on lkml.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/8/332
> I'll fiddle them out now from David's branch but please add them to your
> next submission.
So may be I can refer to above post in my next posting. Will that work? As
he is working on the those patches, I thought it would make sense if he
does the posting and I simply refer to these patches.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists