linux-kernel - Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDOMVjPv+-9J51xA1xYc6Wn=uf8xTibjeg+-ey4hRTuVA+pZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:54:59 -0400
From:	Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 9

On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 07/09/2014 11:56 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> Very well then I just wnated  the info for the conversation into my email.
>> Seems not a good idea to do on the list. Seems better to do it this way.
>> Nick
>>
>
> <see below>
>
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>> On 07/09/2014 11:47 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:11:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>> On 07/09/2014 10:07 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: Stephen Rothwell wrote on Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:31 AM
>>>>>> Subject: linux-next: Tree for Jul 9
>>>>>> To: linux-next@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since 20140708:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Stephen,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A lot of your builds that are failing seem to build for me. Please try
>>>>>> a compiler toolchain
>>>>>> newer then gcc 4.6.3 to see if this is why your builds are failing.
>>>>>> Since all the arm builds
>>>>>> you have failing build for me.
>>>>>> Cheers Nick
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Nick,
>>>>>
>>>>> Does your email client interface have a "Reply All" or "Reply to All" button
>>>>> or selection that you can use?  Please use that instead of Forwarding each message.
>>>>> That will make it easier to read the email threading.
>>>>>
>>>> I suspect he may be using an e-mail client from a certain vendor in Redmond, WA.
>>>> It appears they have not heard that there is something like '>' to mark original
>>>> text in e-mail replies.
>>>
>>> He used Reply one time and then reverted back to his old ways.
>>>
>>> Nick, the idea is to use Reply all the time, not just one time.
>>> That is, if you want to do things correctly and are not just wasting our time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ~Randy
>
> The mail thread is all here (just above here), so Reply does keep it,
> it's just at the bottom of the email instead of at the top.
> That's the way we prefer it, so please don't top-post your replies;
> move the text cursor to the bottom of the email and then begin typing.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> ~Randy


Ok Randy ,
Thanks for the help. Hope this message is better makes sense to me.
Cheers Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/