lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F32857896@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 23:27:07 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...gle.com>
CC:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ewout van Bekkum <ewout@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] x86-mce: check if no_way_out applies before
 deciding not to clear MCE banks.

> to run with tolerant=3, but I kind of understood the logic to be that
> if we're going to keep running, we need to clear the banks, and if
> we're going to crash, we need to leave them intact 

That makes sense ... fold some text like that into the commit
description, and this part is:

Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ