lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:06:28 +0200
From:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
CC:	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, nm@...com,
	b.zolnierkie@...saung.com, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, swarren@...dotorg.org,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] devfreq: exynos4: Support dt and use common
 ppmu driver

On 03/17/2014 02:58 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On 03/15/2014 02:58 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> However, this driver, even after applying your series, is still far
>> from a state that would allow it to be enabled. The most important
>> issue is direct access to CMU registers, based on static mapping,
>> which is not allowed on multiplatform kernels and
>> multiplatform-awareness for drivers is currently a must.
>>
>> To allow this driver to be enabled, it needs to be converted to use
>> common clock framework functions to configure all clocks, e.g.
>> clk_set_rate(), clk_set_parent(), etc., without accessing CMU
>> registers directly.
>>
>> Of course as long as the driver is effectively unusable, to keep
>> development, we can proceed with refactoring it step-by-step and
>> your series would be basically the first step, after addressing the
>> review comments.
>>
>
> I agree your opinion. When setting frequency of memory bus, this
> driver access directly to CMU registers. I know it should be modified
> by using common clk framework as your comment.
>
> I'll send patch set about using common clk framework instead of CMU
> register based on static mapping after finished the review and apply
> of this patch set as next step.

Hi Chanwoo,

any news on this?

I would love to test this devfreq driver with the clk_set_floor_rate API 
I'm adding to the common clk framework.

Regards,

Tomeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ