[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53BD421F.8020904@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 18:52:39 +0530
From: Anil Shashikumar Belur <askb23@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: m.chehab@...sung.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: nokia_h4p: nokia_core.c - removed IRQF_DISABLED
macro
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 05:16 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I wonder if it would maek sense to do
> ./include/linux/interrupt.h:#define IRQF_DISABLED 0 to make it extra
> clear that it is nop now? Pavel
yes - it makes sense. there are still a few references to the macro in
the code.
Cheers,
Anil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists