[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140709142333.503a9e39@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 14:23:33 +0100
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs
> I like the sound of going to the standard ttyS notation and only
> providing ports for ones that exist, but is this userspace-visible
ttyS is 8250 compatible UARTS.
If the Samsung is not an 8250 compatible UART then it doesn't belong as
ttyS from the kernel perspective.
How your udev handles it is up to you.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists