linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] ata: libahci: allow to use multiple PHYs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Jul 2014 11:42:32 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Antoine Ténart 
	<antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, kishon@...com,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, zmxu@...vell.com,
	jszhang@...vell.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] ata: libahci: allow to use multiple PHYs

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09/07/2014 at 09:59:10 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote :
> > Heh, I get that but, at the same time, this is the point where you're
> > most motivated to actually work on it.  :)
> > 
> 
> Or, starting that kind of review after 9 revisions, especially so close
> to the end of the development cycle is discouraging enough and will
> probably be used as an example of why we still have so many evil vendor
> trees.

Yeap, that's my bad.  I should have paid more attention.  Sorry about
that.  We still have quite a few weeks to go tho, so I don't think
it's too unreasonable to at least look into it.  We're gonna have to
do it anyway.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/