linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] tty: serial: 8250 core: add runtime pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53BD6EB3.4020305@linutronix.de>
Date:	Wed, 09 Jul 2014 18:32:51 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	balbi@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] tty: serial: 8250 core: add runtime pm

On 07/09/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> And also please note that for runtime PM the wake-up events need
> to be always enabled, so the device_may_wakeup() checks should
> be only implemented for suspend and resume. I think I got that
> corrected for most part in omap-serial.c recently, but knowing
> that might reduce the confusion a bit :)

Ehm. I also added it to omap_8250_pm() as it is done in omap-serial (in
serial_omap_pm()). Should I get rid of it in the latter?

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/